I firmly oppose hate speech. Because it undermines human dignity. That's why, even when I've strongly criticized every president this country has had, I've never resorted to hatred or generalization. I've chanted for anti-communism, anti-China, and freedom, but I've never baselessly hated or generalized an entire group.
But this man, Lee Jae-myung—he's the only president I think hatred toward could be justified.
From the moment he was elected, he handed out subsidies to the people by taking on national debt with pointless policies, ultimately increasing the national debt, driving up prices and the exchange rate. Meanwhile, he provided inter-Korean policy support to the North Korean government, which cares nothing about its people and only looks out for its own interests. Furthermore, he recently amended the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization to suppress freedom of expression even on the internet, creating a framework for state intervention. He even blocked leverage, sending stock prices plummeting. And in the 'spin-kick' case, he stripped the prosecution of investigative authority, yet he never even read the relevant criminal procedure law.
I'm not writing this to justify hatred.
It's because President Lee Jae-myung, pretending to work for the Korean people, driven by a delusional sense of being the only one who can save the country, doesn't respect opposing views. Instead, he ignores citizens' opinions like trash, demonizes all systems needed for the country, and insists on abolishing them rather than improving them. It's not just because he's a four-time felon with charges of obstruction of official duties, impersonating a prosecutor, drunk driving, and lavish use of corporate cards—it's because these are actual events that happened.
You can downvote this post and hate me. You can curse me for justifying hatred all you want. I didn't write this to tear someone down or to incite—I wrote it to emphasize the crisis of reality as it is. I just want you to understand that.
All I want is for a system to exist fairly, so that citizens can live freely and happily, and no one suffers injustice.
everyone except fucking losers thinks that way
More
This is something a lot of people misunderstand. The subsidies in the first place come from national debt, which everyone has to pay back later. Yet when I bring this up, the people who support it keep saying, "Then don't take it," and the conversation just goes nowhere. If I could opt out of the debt and not have to pay it later, I'd gladly refuse the money too. But the thing is, even if I don't take it, the debt still comes out of my taxes, so it's pointless. Worse, I'm worried that the leftover subsidy money—instead of going into the national budget—might end up in someone's back pocket. So I can't really afford to refuse it... I totally understand the desire of politicians to make money. What percentage of people on this planet today actually hate money? But I think the method is the problem. It would be great if they could grow the country, make it better, increase economic power, and earn money that way. But that's a long and difficult road, so it seems only the politicians who choose the easy and convenient path are left. That's a pretty bleak feeling...
More
honestly i just don't get why anyone would support getting rid of supplementary investigation rights. their masters like it so they like it too i guess..
More